Archive for June, 2010

Your Clients Are Not Stupid

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Designer smart – Client stupid. It’s a fairly common complaint in our industry. Granted, I hear it far less now that I work at a place that focuses on professionalism, but nonetheless the sentiment still finds a way to creep in around the edges. It’s easy to fall in to: “I worked REAL hard. They obviously don’t get it.” The problem is, the client paid for “it”, so you are kinda obligated to help them understand what “it” is and how “it” meets the agreed upon goals of the project, right?

Yes, a client can fail you. They may not be forthcoming with the right information, or they could throw it at you at the wrong time. I have found in my experience that this is not a matter of insufficient brain-stuffs. Clients don’t come with built in knowledge of how the creative process works, and this is an opportunity for you – the designer – to flex your expertise and bring your client up to speed. Advise, educate, and be unapologetic about getting the information you need to make the project a success.

My approach – well before writing off clients as imbeciles – is to evaluate if I have failed. Design chops aside, a healthy portion of this business is communication. If there is a breakdown in understanding during discovery, I may wind up on the wrong track and choose the wrong strategy. If everything runs smoothly, but the client repeatedly makes bad choices, then I am failing to adequately communicate the reason why those choices are wrong. Basically, if I find myself frustrated by my client’s position, I am probably neglecting some aspect of the conversation.

No matter how hard we work to understand our client’s business and motivations, we cannot be them. We will never understand their intent fully, so we do our best and every now and then, the client disagrees. It is how we handle this disagreement that makes us both better designers and true professionals. Take a breather and realize we all worked hard to get where we are. Business can’t suffer fools for long. Yes, a client may not be familiar with the nuance of typography or social media, etc., but that lack of experience is why they hired you. A client needs to focus on the myriad aspects of their business; you need to be the design expert and in most cases, a bit of an educator as well.

To even suggest that a client’s intellect is inferior because they disagree is just plain childish. Suck up your creative angst and try to see where they are coming from. Understand their motivations, or risk looking stupid yourself.

Updated Feeds

Monday, June 21st, 2010

We’ve just finished some maintenance of the Unit Verse RSS and ATOM feeds and would encourage all subscribers to update their subscription settings. The default feeds you are already subscribed to will continue to function, but if you are tired of seeing, “Tweet XXXXXXXXX” and following links from those postings to broken pages on our site, then the new feeds are for you! We’ve also added feeds that exclude tweets altogether if that is something that is also on your wish list.

Again, these are new feeds with distinct locations. You will need to change your subscription settings to use them.

Main RSS Feed

http://unitinteractive.com/blog/feed/main/

RSS Feed Without Tweets

http://unitinteractive.com/blog/feed/no-tweets/

Main ATOM Feed

http://unitinteractive.com/blog/feed/atom-main/

ATOM Feed Without Tweets

http://unitinteractive.com/blog/feed/atom-no-tweets/

In Case of Design — Inject Critical Thinking

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Frida Jeppsson has just released her curated collection on critical discourse, In Case of Design—Inject Critical Thinking, featuring essay contributions by Max Bruinsma, Gareth Williams, Donna Loveday, Rory Dodd, Steven Heller, Rick Poynor, Michael Rock, Anna Gerber and Teal Triggs, Kate Andrews, and myself.

In Case of Design--Inject Critical Thinking

I just received my advance copy yesterday (took a while to go from Sweden to Texas), but the book is now available from Frida’s website.

The essays in the book examine critical discourse from several vantage points and in different contexts. As the editor, design critic and curator Frida Jeppsson puts it, “The book is as much an experiment as an excursion aiming to investigate what scenarios, results, and opportunities a new language and an illuminated and extended critical discourse can produce.” Having just received my copy, I have yet to consume the entire contents, but the parts I’ve read have been wonderful and, given the other contributors, the rest promises to be excellent.

Hats off to Frida for collecting thoughts on this important topic and presenting them so nicely. And thanks so much for including me among the contributors.

Scoping a Project

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Wireframes

Here’s a set of project wireframes up for evaluation as part of the scope-defining process for a project bid. So instead of 56 separate templates to design we defined 31 modular components (for design/CSS) and some variations on form layouts. What seemed a large-ish design project became far more manageable after an inventory.

Not all project scope processes are this involved, but the occasional wallpapering exercise for evaluation can help. Good times.

Tweet 15725567258

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Unify loves your design: http://bit.ly/bil7pt If your site is designed well and runs Unify, send us a URL to be showcased.

Tweet 15718330286

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Unify 1.3.2 is up! Fixed some pesky bugs – most notably file browsing and pages nav: http://bit.ly/1Q6hF9 Update now!

The Most Important Element of a Professional Designer

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Eyes Ears or Mouth?

Irony

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Just wondering, but does anyone but me find it ironic that in an industry that is needlessly made more dangerous every year because of inane and increasingly misguided, activist-driven policies sending them further and further offshore, a company that spends $ billions every year and risks much more in an effort to help meet the world’s demand for petroleum—a company staffed by folks who risk their lives every single day while enduring extended separations from their families and loved ones—has to endure criticism from uninformed ingrates who could never fathom the courage, commitment, and responsibility required to do the job that BP employees have to do?

The childish and oblivious people behind things like these re-imagined BP logos and countless other public commentaries and observations will never in their lives have to commit to the sorts of risks that BP employees and others in the petroleum industry make every day. These folks do these things and risk all because the world demands that someone do this dangerous and thankless job. If they didn’t, our lives would be turned upside down. Oil isn’t just for fuel and gasoline; nearly every industry on earth requires petroleum products for its materials and processes.

When the job is incredibly dangerous and difficult, mistakes will have consequences of the same magnitude. In this case, some BP people, government people, and manufacturing people made bad mistakes. Mistakes will happen, but in the face of mistakes only monumental idiocy can maintain that the work must cease.

If not for the feeble minds and malevolent morons that have forced misguided policies driving drilling rigs beyond safe working depths, this very same drilling leak would have been stopped within hours. But while we demand the lifestyle, convenience, and energy that petroleum brings, too many have made it their mission to turn a relatively easy process and safe industry into one of the world’s most difficult and dangerous ones. Then, when as a result of terrible mistakes (which will always occur) bad things happen, the industry receives venom and criticism from the very ones who directly caused the magnitude of the result. It’s a shame that too many are too uninformed or just too stupid to grasp these facts and the excruciating ironies that accompany them.

This recent event was a terrible tragedy for the fact that 11 men lost their lives, but there the tragedy ends. The economic results will take time for us to weather, but we will. The environmental results are bad now, but will be inconsequential in 10 year’s time. In any event, the world needs the product that BP and their industrial brethren collect. But when bad things happen, make sure that the right people are receiving the right criticism. And before you opt to criticize and become a victim of your own irony, you might check to see if you even have the balls to do for one day what they do every day; what they do for you.

Recommended
Most Popular
Underappreciated